Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://middlepowers.fyi/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

Regional Summary

Every Wound Self-Inflicted The most striking fact about Central and Eastern Europe this week is not that its pro-Western governments are under pressure from without — they are holding — but that the most damaging blows keep coming from within. Ukraine struck Russia at distances that would have seemed implausible a year ago and persuaded Britain to join a European financial structure it left five years ago. Hungary’s new prime minister returned from Brussels with an EU endorsement and a formal agreement date. Romania’s pro-European coalition kept its external commitments intact even as it collapsed. And yet in each case the week’s most consequential development was self-inflicted. Ukraine’s military campaign showed its range most dramatically in the Baltic — a Karakurt-class missile carrier destroyed at Primorsk, roughly 1,000 kilometres from the front. Attacks on refineries at Perm and Orsk reached 1,500 kilometres; Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that Ukraine has more than doubled its deep-strike range to roughly 1,750 kilometres since 2022. Kyiv asked Israel to seize a vessel carrying 25,200 tonnes of allegedly looted Ukrainian grain, turning a shipping dispute into a public test of whether third-country ports will act against Russian-linked cargoes. Mr Zelensky turned Moscow’s one-day Victory Day ceasefire offer — floated after a call between the American president and Vladimir Putin — into a liability for the Kremlin by demanding 30 days of unconditional quiet as a minimum. Whichever side refuses takes the blame for the war continuing. Britain’s decision to enter talks on joining the EU’s €78 billion Ukraine loan, post-Brexit and under American pressure, was a measure of how far European solidarity has come; Donald Tusk, Poland’s prime minister, announced a drone programme drawing on Ukrainian battlefield expertise, and even Andrej Babiš, the Czech prime minister — back in power in Prague and conspicuously unwilling to discuss new money at the European Political Community summit in Yerevan — met Mr Zelensky for the first time since returning to power in December, a gesture that cost him nothing but confirmed the diplomatic isolation of outright refusal. Against all this, a corruption scandal involving Tymur Mindich, a businessman, kept widening, with new recordings allegedly implicating the former presidential chief of staff and the National Security Council secretary; a Kyiv newspaper asked directly whether Mr Zelensky is implicated. A new rotation order capping front-line deployments at two months was an admission that the army had left soldiers in the same positions for 502 consecutive days. The external campaign has rarely looked stronger. The internal contract is visibly under strain. Hungary’s Péter Magyar illustrates the same pattern in miniature. He flew to Brussels on April 29, met the European Commission president and the European Council president, and walked away with a May 25 agreement date and a clear path to unlocking €10.4 billion in Covid recovery funds before they expire in August, plus billions more in cohesion funds and defence loans. His parliamentary supermajority means the legal changes required can move fast. Then he came home and appointed his brother-in-law as justice minister — the most politically exposed post in his cabinet, the one most directly tied to EU fund conditions, and the one where the appearance of independence is the entire point. Mr Magyar acknowledged the appointment “created a serious dilemma” and had his sister resign her judgeship to limit the damage. The damage is not eliminated: the minister overseeing judicial reform and accession to the European public prosecutor’s office is a member of the prime minister’s family. Viktor Orbán, on his way out, had left a further trap — his government’s written refusal to implement a court ruling that Hungary’s law equating homosexuality with paedophilia violates EU law. The May 25 Brussels agreement will almost certainly require compliance as a first milestone. Mr Magyar will either implement it and absorb the domestic cost or appear to continue Mr Orbán’s EU defiance. The week produced one reassuring signal — Mr Magyar returned a large billionaire donation to avoid any taint of oligarchic ties — and one alarming one. Both came from the same man. Romania’s crisis is harder to reverse. The Social Democratic Party and the far-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians (AUR) filed a joint no-confidence motion with 251 signatures — 18 more than needed — on April 28, and the National Liberal Party declared it will not reconfigure with the Social Democrats under any arrangement. That closes off the mechanism that resolved every previous Romanian political crisis. Nicușor Dan, Romania’s president, now faces a choice among options he has publicly rejected: a government backed by the Social Democrats and the alliance, a minority government with no base, or early elections Romania has never held. George Simion, the alliance’s leader, made the subtext explicit by proposing Călin Georgescu as prime minister if the Social Democrats agreed — a signal not of ideological seriousness but of a protest party converting votes into cabinet seats. The currency hit a historic low of 5.1417 lei to the euro on April 30, briefly exceeding 5.20 in the interbank market. The European Commission confirmed it had cut €458.7 million from Romania’s recovery fund payment while releasing €350.7 million previously suspended — a net loss of €108 million and the first confirmed, quantified EU fund loss on record. Three rating agencies already hold Romania at the lowest investment grade on negative outlook; none has acted, but the conditions are now more acute than at any point this year. Romania’s NATO commitments, its missile defence installation at Deveselu, and its F-35 procurement remain untouched; the threat to its Western alignment would only crystallise if Mr Dan hands the alliance cabinet posts, and he has constitutional tools to resist. That is not yet the story. The story is that the pro-European coalition has broken in a way that gives the far right a legitimate claim to govern. Central and Eastern Europe’s course is not in serious doubt. Ukraine is forcing Russia to defend its own territory at ranges that reshape the economic logic of the war. A Hungarian government elected on restoring rule of law has a mandate, a supermajority, and a timetable. Romania’s external commitments are intact. But the week makes clear that the region’s pro-European trajectory is most vulnerable not to Russian pressure or American distance but to the interior weaknesses its own leaders keep creating — corruption in Kyiv, nepotism in Budapest, coalition arithmetic in Bucharest. The next test is not whether these governments can hold the external line. They can. It is whether they can hold themselves together long enough to make that line mean something.

Country Summaries


Ukraine flag Ukraine

The week Ukraine struck deeper into Russia than at any point in the war — hitting a Baltic port 1,750 kilometres from the front — was also the week it rejected Moscow’s ceasefire proposal and demanded a better one. After a call between the American president and Putin, Russia proposed a one-day halt to fighting on May 9, Victory Day. Volodymyr Zelensky called it “manipulative theatre” designed to secure Moscow’s parade. He asked his team to seek clarification from Washington and countered with a demand for a 30-day unconditional ceasefire as a minimum test of Russian seriousness. The Kremlin declared the ceasefire would proceed regardless, with Dmitry Peskov, its spokesman, stating that “a response is not, in fact, required.” Andrii Sybiha, the foreign minister, called the proposal “a crude diplomatic manoeuvre.” The exchange transformed what Moscow framed as a goodwill gesture into a public test: whichever side refuses 30 days of quiet takes the blame for the war continuing. Even as that diplomatic contest played out, Ukraine’s military was hitting Russia at distances that would have seemed implausible a year ago. Strikes hit the Primorsk Baltic port — roughly 1,000 kilometres from the front, near the Finnish border — destroying a Karakurt-class cruise missile carrier and a patrol boat. Attacks on refineries at Perm and Orsk reached 1,500 kilometres. Ukraine struck the Tuapse Black Sea refinery four times in 16 days, causing an oil spill and a toxic chemical emergency. Ukraine destroyed at least three shadow-fleet tankers near Novorossiysk. Mr Zelensky confirmed that Ukraine has more than doubled its deep-strike range to roughly 1,750 kilometres since 2022. Russia downplayed the Tuapse hits but quietly cut the scale of its Victory Day parade, citing a “terrorist threat.” The strikes are military operations and economic warfare at once. This week Ukraine extended that campaign to grain. Kyiv’s foreign ministry formally asked Israel to seize the Panormitis, a vessel carrying 25,200 tonnes of grain allegedly looted from Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory. Israel’s foreign minister accused Kyiv of “Twitter diplomacy.” The ship left Haifa without unloading after the Israeli importer refused the cargo. Mr Sybiha called it “a clear signal to all other vessels, captains, operators, insurers, and governments.” Mr Zelensky announced a broader campaign against Russia’s shadow grain fleet, extending economic pressure from oil and tankers into agricultural commodities. Ukraine’s European diplomacy deepened in parallel. At the European Political Community summit in Yerevan — Mr Zelensky’s first visit to Armenia — he met the leaders of Britain, the Czech Republic, Norway, and Finland, offering Helsinki a drone technology-sharing deal. Keir Starmer, Britain’s prime minister, announced that the UK is entering talks to join the EU’s €78 billion Ukraine loan, describing it as part of deepening European defence ties under American pressure. Post-Brexit Britain is voluntarily joining an EU-led financial structure on security grounds — a shift that would have seemed far-fetched five years ago. In Rzeszów, meanwhile, Donald Tusk, Poland’s prime minister, announced that Poland will build a “drone armada” drawing on Ukrainian battlefield expertise in drone tactics, electronic warfare, and production. Yuliia Svyrydenko, Ukraine’s prime minister, framed Ukraine as having “transformed from an aid recipient to a major defence producer.” At home, the military is trying to repair a broken social contract with its soldiers. General Oleksandr Syrskyi, the commander-in-chief, signed an order capping frontline deployments at two months, with mandatory rotation and medical examination within the following month. The order came after viral images emerged of emaciated soldiers from the 14th Mechanised Brigade who had reportedly served 502 consecutive days on the same position. Separately, Mr Zelensky announced a military reform package for June: infantry combat pay to more than triple, rear-area pay to rise roughly 50% to about $470 a month, and a new contract system establishing defined terms that would allow the longest-serving mobilised soldiers to be demobilised. Mykhailo Fedorov, the defence minister, described the package as systemic. The implied funding source is the EU’s €90 billion loan, whose first tranche is expected in June — tying Ukraine’s ability to hold its army together directly to continued European financial support. The economic picture is more stable than feared but worse than projected. Ukraine’s National Bank held its key rate at 15%, cut its 2026 GDP growth forecast to 1.3% from 1.8%, and raised its inflation projection to 9.4% from 7.5%. First-quarter growth was 0.2%. The bank cited Russian attacks on energy infrastructure — including a “grid islanding” campaign targeting transmission lines — a harsh winter, and fuel-price spillover from the war in Iran. Set against that, the bank’s 2025 results were a record: international reserves reached $57.3 billion, up more than 30% from $43.8 billion at the end of 2024, the highest in Ukraine’s independent history. Of the 155 billion hryvnias in profit, 146.1 billion will go to the state budget — nearly double the 2024 transfer. The corruption scandal around Tymur Mindich escalated. Fresh audio recordings published by Ukrainska Pravda and two opposition lawmakers include transcripts that allegedly mention Andriy Yermak, the former presidential chief of staff, and Rustem Umerov, the National Security Council secretary. Mr Umerov denied involvement. Ms Svyrydenko denied in parliament knowing Mindich or visiting his home. The Kyiv Independent published an explainer asking directly whether Mr Zelensky is implicated. The Anti-Corruption Action Centre said Mr Zelensky “should have ensured a fully transparent investigation and the dismissal of everyone implicated,”
Ukraine escalates deep strikes on Russian oil infrastructure and shadow fleet tankers
April 29 – May 03, 2026
Syrskyi orders mandatory two-month frontline rotation cap for Ukrainian troops
April 30 – May 01, 2026
Russian forces advance on Kostiantynivka as Syrskyi reports intensified Donetsk attacks
May 1–3, 2026
Ukraine-Israel diplomatic row over stolen grain ship resolved as vessel leaves Haifa without unloading
April 27 – May 01, 2026
NBU holds benchmark rate at 15%, cuts 2026 GDP forecast to 1.3% as war and Iran conflict fuel inflation
April 27 – May 03, 2026

Poland flag Poland

On the same day Donald Tusk, the prime minister, called NATO’s course “catastrophic,”
Nawrocki establishes New Constitution Council on May 3; Tusk dismisses initiative as 'political game'
April 30 – May 03, 2026
Tusk warns of 'catastrophic' NATO disintegration after US announces withdrawal of 5,000 troops from Germany
April 27 – May 03, 2026
Sejm rejects opposition no-confidence votes against Climate and Health ministers, coalition holds
April 28–30, 2026

Czech Republic flag Czech Republic

Andrej Babiš and Volodymyr Zelensky met for the first time since Mr Babiš returned to power in December, on the sidelines of the European Political Community (EPC) summit in Yerevan on May 3 — and what was not discussed mattered more than what was. Mr Babiš refused to talk about money. “They left us an empty treasury, a budget hole,
Babiš meets Zelensky in Yerevan on sidelines of European Political Community summit
May 1–3, 2026
Czech PM leads major Central Asia and South Caucasus trade mission; energy and defense deals signed
April 27 – May 03, 2026
Czech National Bank Governor Michl argues for Bitcoin allocation in sovereign reserves at Las Vegas conference
April 28 – May 01, 2026
Okamura visits Belgrade, meets Vučić and Brnabić; calls Czech recognition of Kosovo a mistake
April 30 – May 02, 2026
Other

Romania flag Romania

Romania’s pro-European government is about to fall — and no one has a clear plan for what comes next. The Social Democratic Party (PSD), the country’s largest party, and the Alliance for the Unity of Romanians (AUR), its leading far-right force, formally submitted a joint no-confidence motion on April 28 with 251 signatures — well above the 233 required. SOS Romania and smaller far-right groups signed on. Marcel Ciolacu predicted it would pass “with the most votes in Romanian history.” The vote is set for May 5. The National Liberal Party (PNL), which anchors the coalition under Ilie Bolojan, the prime minister, declared it will not join a new coalition with the Social Democrats whatever the result. That closes off the path that resolved every prior Romanian political crisis — a Social Democrat-Liberal reconfiguration under a different prime minister. With that route gone, Nicușor Dan, the president, faces a constitutional choice he cannot easily escape: appoint a prime minister backed by the PSD-AUR majority, which he has publicly denounced; install a minority government with no parliamentary base; or allow the 60-day formation clock to run out toward early elections that Romania has never held. George Simion, the alliance’s leader, made the stakes explicit: the party would back Călin Georgescu as prime minister if the Social Democrats agreed. The proposal may be tactical — an attempt to win a share of power rather than a genuine offer — but it signals the alliance’s intent. The crisis is not simply about removing Mr Bolojan; it is about winning a seat in government. A Bucharest political analyst quoted by AP called it a crisis that “breaks the pro-European coalition and offers the populist party AUR a place at the mainstream table.” Mr Simion also attacked both parties over the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) defence programme, calling roughly €10 billion in procurement contracts a “financial heist.” Mr Bolojan pushed back at a press conference, confirming that the €16 billion SAFE programme’s management structure was set up under Mr Ciolacu’s government and that procurement decisions follow plans approved by the Supreme Defence Council years before the current cabinet took office. He confirmed Rheinmetall will receive roughly €5 billion, but said at least half of all SAFE-funded acquisitions will be produced in Romania. The dispute is political noise; the programme itself is unchanged, with no evidence of cancellation or redirection. The political crisis has coincided with — and in part caused — a sharp currency shock. On April 30, the official rate reached 5.1417 lei per euro, a historic low the press named “Black Thursday for the leu”; the interbank market briefly exceeded 5.20. The National Bank of Romania confirmed it had begun managing currency pressure from the moment the Social Democrats decided to leave the coalition. Its spokesperson said the market would calm “in the near future”; Cristian Popa, a board member, warned the political crisis risks blocking fiscal consolidation altogether. Multiple analysts described the exchange rate as “the least bad thing happening to us right now.” They had a point. The European Commission confirmed this week that it has cut €458.7 million from Romania’s third payment request under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), while releasing €350.7 million that had been suspended — a net loss of roughly €108 million. Dragoș Pîslaru, the minister of European projects, attributed the cuts to incomplete reforms under the Ciolacu era; Adrian Câciu, a former Social Democratic minister, accused Mr Pîslaru of hiding his own incompetence. The political argument is secondary: the Commission has issued its final decision, and this is the first confirmed, quantified PNRR fund loss on record. Three rating agencies already hold Romania at the lowest investment grade on negative outlook. None has acted yet, but the conditions — a currency at historic lows, confirmed EU fund losses, and an imminent change of government that championed fiscal consolidation — are now more acute than at any point this year. Romania’s external commitments held through all of it. Mr Dan attended a Three Seas Initiative summit and a Moldova Coordination Group leaders’ meeting during the same week the motion was filed, as he had done when the coalition first collapsed in late April. Romania’s NATO commitments, its Deveselu missile defence installation, and its F-35 procurement remain untouched. The threat to Romania’s Western alignment is not this week’s story; it would become one only if a post-Bolojan government handed the alliance cabinet posts — and Mr Dan has constitutional tools to resist that.
PSD and AUR file joint no-confidence motion against Bolojan government, vote scheduled for May 5
April 27 – May 03, 2026
SAFE defense program management becomes political battlefield as Bolojan and Ciolacu trade blame
April 28 – May 03, 2026
Romania loses €458.7 million from PNRR Payment Request 3; PSD and current government trade blame
May 1–3, 2026
Romanian leu falls to historic lows against euro amid political crisis; BNR says market will stabilize
April 29 – May 02, 2026

Hungary flag Hungary

Péter Magyar returned from Brussels this week having secured an explicit endorsement from the European Commission, only to undercut himself at home by appointing his brother-in-law to the one cabinet post that matters most for his promised rule-of-law overhaul. The Brussels trip delivered more than expected. Magyar met Ursula von der Leyen and António Costa, the European Council president, on April 29 and called the talks “extremely constructive and successful.” Ms von der Leyen confirmed “a very good exchange” and pledged Commission support for Hungary’s realignment with European values. Both sides set a May 25 date for Magyar — by then sworn in as prime minister — to return and sign a formal political agreement. Time is short: €10.4bn in Covid recovery funds expire at the end of August. A further €6.3bn in cohesion funds, €16.1bn in defence loans, and relief from a €1m daily migration fine all depend on the same set of reforms. EU officials noted that Magyar’s parliamentary supermajority means the legal changes needed to unlock those funds can move quickly. Even as he negotiated in Brussels, Magyar set a condition of his own. He proposed a meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky in Berehove, in western Ukraine, and said Hungary would not support Ukraine’s EU accession unless Kyiv restored cultural, linguistic, and higher-education rights for Transcarpathian Hungarians. Mr Zelensky told Bloomberg he would meet Magyar “in some form” and said “there will be no problem” on the minority question, while acknowledging “it is possible not everything has been resolved.” The EU is pressing Magyar to drop the condition; so far he is holding it while framing the approach cooperatively — offering a meeting rather than a veto. It is the Trianon constraint working within a broadly pro-Western position, not a break from it. The harder domestic problem arrived through Magyar’s own cabinet. He named Márton Melléthei-Barna — his brother-in-law, married to his sister Anna Ilona — as justice minister, the most politically exposed post in his government and the one most directly tied to the EU fund conditions. Magyar defended the pick: Mr Melléthei-Barna was a founding Tisza Party member, the party’s legal director, and its representative on election bodies. Magyar acknowledged the appointment “created a serious dilemma for me” and announced his sister would step down as a judge to avoid the appearance of overlapping branches of power. Criticism came from Fidesz, from László Toroczkai of the Our Homeland Movement (Mi Hazánk) — who said Magyar had “entered the antechamber of dictatorship” — and from some Tisza supporters. The step reduces the problem but does not eliminate it. The deeper problem is structural: the minister overseeing accession to the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, judicial reform, and anti-corruption legislation is a member of the prime minister’s family, in a portfolio where the appearance of independence is the whole point. Orbán handed Magyar a further complication on his way out. On April 30, the outgoing prime minister wrote to Tamás Sulyok, the president — the letter released by Gergely Gulyás, the incoming Fidesz faction leader — declaring that his government would not implement the April 21 ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) that Hungary’s 2021 law equating homosexuality with paedophilia violates EU law. Orbán called the ruling “clearly political” and a violation of Hungarian sovereignty. The court found the restrictions constitute direct discrimination based on sexual orientation. Magyar has pledged compliance with CJEU rulings as part of his programme; the May 25 Brussels agreement will almost certainly include this ruling as a milestone. He inherits it as one of his first compliance tests. The political design is transparent: Orbán forces him either to implement a ruling that remains unpopular in parts of his electorate or to appear to continue Orbán-era EU defiance. The central bank added a second hard deadline. Mihály Varga, the governor, held the base rate at 6.25% on April 28 and signalled conditional support for the incoming government’s economic policy — “if we know what it means and if it doesn’t fuel inflation.” He warned that credit-rating agencies would expect a credible medium-term fiscal plan by autumn. That puts a second clock alongside the August recovery-fund expiry: the new government has roughly three to four months to present a consolidation plan that international investors find credible. Mr Varga projected inflation may exceed 5% in the second half of 2026 due to energy-price effects. The forint has strengthened sharply since the election; Goldman Sachs projects HUF 345 to the euro by year end, and the bank’s foreign-exchange reserves have risen from €44bn to €60bn. The bank is also filing criminal complaints about spending under former governor György Matolcsy, has cut its staff by 15%, and is selling assets including a Balaton resort and two conference properties. Efforts to intercept the flight of Orbán-era money produced visible results but exposed the limits of enforcement. Foreign-owned Hungarian banks froze roughly HUF 11bn in an account linked to government media operations, and also blocked individual transactions of $10–20m bound for Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, and a Vienna private bank. Reuters reported Magyar’s claim that the tax authority suspended transfers linked to Antal Rogán’s circle worth billions of forints on money-laundering suspicions — though Reuters could not verify this independently. The more revealing detail came from Pénzcentrum, citing VSquare: the blocked amounts were “only an insignificant fraction of the total wealth intended to be moved out.” Larger channels remain open. The investigative outlet Átlátszó separately documented 16 luxury assets — cars, yachts, and private planes — linked to figures from Orbán’s political network (NER) accumulated over 16 years. On the cultural side, investigative reporting revealed that the outgoing Fidesz government distributed over HUF 17bn through a special National Cultural Fund committee to Fidesz-aligned performers and Fidesz campaign organisations in its final weeks, while the Cultural Ministry distributed a further HUF 3bn directly. Three named individuals controlled the decisions. Several board members resigned. Zsolt Hegedűs, the incoming health minister, publicly demanded the resignation of Balázs Hankó, the outgoing culture minister, citing the contrast with Hungary’s chronically underfunded hospitals. Orbán offered his resignation as Fidesz party president at an April 28 meeting; the national board declined to vote and deferred the question to a June 13 congress. He confirmed he will not take up his parliamentary seat, saying he is “needed now not in parliament but in the reorganisation of the right-wing.” EUobserver reported speculation that he could seek a European Parliament seat, which would give him some legal protection as accountability proceedings advance — though obtaining one would require a by-election or list reassignment. Sulyok, meanwhile, lost a symbolic vote: the Holy Crown Council blocked his proposal to move the Holy Crown to the plenary hall for the May 9 inaugural oath, and a petition in his support attracted fewer than 100,000 signatures despite Orbán promoting it. His removal remains constitutionally difficult. A constitutional law professor cited by Kontroll confirmed that ousting him requires both a two-thirds parliamentary vote and a two-thirds Constitutional Court vote — Tisza’s supermajority alone is not enough. The Fidesz-packed court would need to cooperate. Sulyok has formally convened the inaugural session regardless: parliament meets at 10:00 on May 9, the prime minister is elected and sworn in at 15:00, and celebrations follow at Kossuth Square. The week produced two signals that pull in opposite directions on Magyar’s political character. He returned HUF 100m donated by billionaire György Wáberer — legally permissible but politically awkward — to avoid, as he put it, “even the appearance” of links to the oligarchy, and pledged future transparency on donations above HUF 500,000. That same week he gave his family the ministry most critical for the anti-NER programme. The Brussels track is advancing faster than expected. The internal track is more constrained — and the constraint this week was self-imposed.
Magyar visits Brussels before inauguration, reports 'successful' talks on unlocking €17 billion in frozen EU funds
April 27 – May 03, 2026
Tisza cabinet finalized but nepotism accusations fly over Magyar's brother-in-law as justice minister
April 27 – May 03, 2026
Orbán offers to resign as Fidesz leader but party defers decision to June congress
April 27 – May 03, 2026
Orbán refuses to implement CJEU ruling against Hungary's anti-LGBT 'child protection' law, writes to Sulyok
May 1–3, 2026
MNB holds interest rate at 6.25%, Varga Mihály pledges cooperation with Tisza but warns on inflation and credit ratings
April 28 – May 01, 2026
May 9 inauguration celebrations planned at Kossuth Square; Magyar clashes with Budapest Mayor Karácsony over competing events
April 28 – May 03, 2026
Sulyok loses Holy Crown vote, presidency future uncertain as Tisza holds removal power
April 27 – May 02, 2026
Index newspaper forced to publish court-ordered correction admitting its Fidesz-era 'Tisza tax plan' articles were false