Skip to main content

Regional Summary

Building Without a Floor The week’s most revealing moment was also its most absurd: the American president twice announced he would call Taiwan’s leader, China deployed more than 100 warships in response, and within 48 hours it emerged that no such call had been scheduled. That episode captures the region’s condition: Washington generates signal without commitment, and every government must decide how much weight to put on what it hears. For Taiwan, the answer is almost none. A senior American official publicly declared a pause on the $14 billion arms package — redirected to preserve munitions for the attack on Iran — while the White House and the Navy secretary offered contradictory explanations. Lai Ching-te, Taiwan’s president, chose this moment to deliver the most explicit sovereignty statement of his two years in office, anchoring it in the 1996 missile crisis, when Chinese missiles fell into the strait and 76% of Taiwanese turned out to vote anyway. He cited 13.69% first-quarter GDP growth as the basis for sustained defence spending — but the legislature has blocked the eight-year procurement plan, the end-of-May deadline for the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) letter of acceptance has arrived, and post-summit People’s Liberation Army activity has exceeded, not returned to, its already-elevated baseline. The forces sustaining Taiwan’s position are real; the forces undercutting it are gathering faster. Japan’s situation differs in form but not structure. At their May summit, Xi Jinping reportedly named Sanae Takaichi, Japan’s prime minister, as a threat to regional peace — a remarkable thing to say about an ally’s prime minister in a bilateral meeting with that ally’s patron — and the American president reportedly pushed back. But Beijing has not waited for diplomacy to settle the question: since December, it has cut exports of dysprosium, terbium, yttrium oxide, and gallium to Japan, calibrated to hit Mitsubishi Heavy Industries’ shipbuilding and aero engine divisions. The logic is tight and punishing — the faster Japan rearms, the more exposed its defence industry becomes to Chinese control of the very inputs rearmament requires. Japan’s response is to build alliances faster: the Quad in New Delhi, a new energy security pact with South Korea, a comprehensive partnership with the Philippines, a constitutional revision process that has moved out of committee. But the defence document laying out all this ambition buries its two key retreats: no spending target, and a formal withdrawal from any suggestion of nuclear latency. Japan is constructing a security architecture whose foundations remain unresolved. The same dynamic — improvisation under American distraction — runs through the rest of the region. South Korea and Japan framed their new energy pact as insurance against American retreat from the Indo-Pacific; both leaders said so publicly, and that candour is new. Lee Jae-myung spent the same week calling Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal under an International Criminal Court warrant and directing his government to assess whether Seoul was legally obliged to arrest him should he arrive — a principled stand or an electoral calculation, or both, nine days before elections in races now tightening faster than polling had suggested. In Indonesia, the rupiah hit a record low, partly from oil disruption caused by the very American military operation that had paused Taiwan’s arms deliveries. Jakarta’s response — a surprise 50-basis-point rate hike, caps on dollar purchases, and a new state entity to route coal, palm oil, and ferronickel exports through a single government-supervised channel — deepened investor alarm rather than eased it. Analysts at Macquarie Capital, S&P Global Energy, and Crédit Agricole all reached the same conclusion: policy uncertainty had grown. Jakarta’s stock exchange fell two days running. Australia has done more than any other country in the region to build a coherent security architecture for this moment — the Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) pact, the Pacific security framework, a deepening relationship with Timor-Leste, and record participation in Balikatan exercises alongside American HIMARS units. But Anthony Albanese’s government now faces the real possibility of being reduced to minority, its political capital spent on a tax reform that is structurally serious but politically exposed. New polling projects a One Nation surge large enough to cost Labor its majority. A minority government does not automatically collapse, but it loses the authority to sustain a decade-long security commitment across changes in parliament and changes in Washington. That Mr Albanese is trying to push the budget package through before the July break — limiting the time the Greens have to harden their conditions — looks less like confidence than evidence of how little margin remains. The region is not paralysed. Alliances are deepening, governments are writing new doctrines, and defence spending is rising. But the week shows that building security architecture around an ambiguous patron is not the same as building without one, and the gaps show up in the details: a paused arms package, a blocked procurement bill, a defence document without a spending target, a rupiah at record lows, a tax reform one election from political collapse. If Washington’s attention stays fixed on the Middle East and its summit signals continue to go unmatched by commitments, each of these partial hedges will face a harder test — and will have to pass it, or fail, alone.

Country Summaries


Taiwan flag Taiwan

The American president said he would call Taiwan’s leader — the first such signal since Washington recognised Beijing in 1979 — and within 48 hours China had deployed over 100 warships across the western Pacific as a warning that the call should not happen. He made the statement on May 20 and repeated it on May 21, but the language worked against him too. “We’ll work on that, the Taiwan problem,” he said — “the Taiwan problem” is Beijing’s preferred framing, and its appearance in the American president’s mouth, whatever his intent, signals that China’s rhetoric has reached the White House. Lai Ching-te said he would be “happy” to talk, pledging to press Taiwan’s status quo commitments and its interest in arms purchases. By May 22, four Reuters sources said no concrete plans existed. The signal generated diplomatic turbulence without delivering any benefit. Beijing’s response was immediate and physical. Joseph Wu, the national security council secretary-general, disclosed on May 23 that China had deployed more than 100 navy, coast guard, and other vessels across waters from the Yellow Sea to the South China Sea in the days after the summit between Xi Jinping and the American president. People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft crossed the median line and entered the air defence identification zone daily from May 19 to 24, including a J-16 and F-16 encounter over the Taiwan Strait. On May 24, a Chinese coast guard ship staged a verbal sovereignty standoff near the Pratas Islands — lightly defended, 400km from Taiwan — before withdrawing. Taiwan’s coast guard called the wording on sovereignty and jurisdiction “unusual.” Post-summit PLA activity has not returned to pre-summit levels; it has exceeded them, confirming that the near-zero activity during the summit was diplomatic choreography, not de-escalation. The arms picture is no clearer. Hung Cao, the acting US Navy secretary, told a Senate appropriations hearing that the $14 billion Taiwan arms package had been “paused” to preserve munitions for the US-Israel attack on Iran. “The foreign military sales will continue when the administration deems necessary,” he said. Taiwan’s presidential office said it had received no information about any adjustment. A White House source told Reuters the sales “take years to process and are unrelated” to the Iran operation. Wellington Koo, the defence minister, said he remained “cautiously optimistic.” That is the most measured reassurance available: the end-of-May deadline for the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) letter of acceptance has arrived, a senior American official has publicly declared a pause, no payment has been confirmed, and the White House and the Navy secretary are saying contradictory things. Mr Lai chose this moment for the most significant sovereignty statement of his two years in office. In his inauguration anniversary address on May 20 — the day after a failed legislative impeachment attempt — he structured his speech around the 30th anniversary of Taiwan’s first direct presidential election, held in 1996 as Chinese missiles fell into the strait and 76% of voters turned out anyway. “Taiwan’s future cannot be decided by forces outside our borders,” he said. “No country has the right to annex Taiwan.” He called for bipartisan unity, cited Q1 GDP growth of 13.69% — a 39-year quarterly high — as the basis for sustained defence investment, and disclosed that the legislature had failed to fully pass the defence special budget act. A new special act would be submitted alongside supplementary and annual budget increases covering arms procurement, international defence cooperation, and air, sea, and land drone production. The opposition’s blockade of the NT$1.25 trillion, eight-year procurement plan is now confirmed: the executive must start again. Beijing responded within hours. Chen Binhua, the Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman, called Mr Lai an “outright destroyer of cross-strait peace” who had “stubbornly adhered to the erroneous stance of Taiwan independence.” Three days later, on May 23, the Presidential Office extended the anniversary into a mass public concert at Pingtung County Stadium, broadcast live across public television and telecom networks. The programming was deliberately cross-linguistic and cross-ethnic — Indigenous, Hakka, new resident, Taiwanese, electronic, rap, rock — projecting democratic identity as inclusive rather than ethnic. The political aim was to turn the speech’s 1996 framing into something that could move a crowd. Mr Lai received Michael Chong, Canada’s Conservative shadow foreign affairs minister and vice-chair of the House of Commons foreign affairs committee, and thanked Ottawa for its unanimous parliamentary motion rejecting Beijing’s use of Resolution 2758 to exclude Taiwan from international bodies. They discussed bilateral agreements on investment, technology, health, and maritime security. The engagement confirms the legitimacy coalition is working, but it cannot substitute for the patron relationship. Economic fundamentals are the strongest of Mr Lai’s tenure. The sovereignty narrative is at its most deliberate. But the patron relationship is conditional, PLA posture has exceeded its already-elevated baseline, the arms delivery mechanism is publicly incoherent, and the legislature has blocked the primary tool for funding Taiwan’s own defence buildup. The forces pull in opposite directions.
Trump signals unprecedented direct call with Lai Ching-te; Beijing protests, no concrete plans confirmed
May 17–22, 2026
China deploys 100+ vessels in First Island Chain post-Trump-Xi summit; Pratas coast guard standoff resolved
May 19–24, 2026

Japan flag Japan

When Xi Jinping told the American president at their May summit that Sanae Takaichi posed a threat to regional peace — naming Japan’s prime minister alongside Taiwan’s president as a shared adversary — the American president reportedly pushed back and defended her. Neither government confirmed the exchange on the record, but the US ambassador separately confirmed that the first call the American president made after the summit went to Tokyo, reaffirming the “ironclad” alliance. That reported exchange marks a shift. Japan is no longer simply briefed after US-China summits; it is the subject of them. The alliance has enough political weight to survive direct Chinese pressure at the highest level — but Xi’s decision to name Ms Takaichi also signals that Beijing has made Japan’s prime minister a direct target, not a peripheral concern. Beijing has not confined its pressure to words. Since December, China has blocked exports of dysprosium, terbium, yttrium oxide, and gallium to Japan. Reuters confirmed this week that the embargo is calibrated to hit Mitsubishi Heavy Industries — Japan’s largest defence conglomerate — targeting its shipbuilding and aero engine divisions. China continues to ship finished rare earth magnets; it is the upstream inputs it has cut. The message is precise: Japan’s defence buildup itself is a legitimate target for supply chain coercion. Shin-Etsu Chemical has halted new dysprosium orders. Japan-backed Lynas in Australia produces roughly 8 metric tons a quarter against China’s prior monthly shipments of 14 metric tons to Japan. Stockpile releases are buying time, not closing the gap. The logic runs in a troubling circle: the faster Japan rearms, the more exposed its defence industry becomes to Chinese grip on the very inputs rearmament requires. Ryosei Akazawa, the trade minister, spoke briefly with China’s commerce minister on May 23 — the first ministerial contact since the dispute began. Japan’s ambassador in Beijing said he was working toward a Takaichi-Xi meeting at APEC but could “not be so optimistic.” Japan’s security doctrine is advancing regardless. Draft proposals from the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) for the December security document revision set a new target: enough ammunition, fuel, and spare parts to fight for one year without resupply. The draft also calls for interceptor drones scaled from prototypes tested in Ukraine, high-energy laser and microwave air defences, and counterstrike-capable next-generation submarines. The document buries two significant changes, however. No specific defence spending target appears — the internal LDP disagreement confirms that committing to 3.5% of GDP is not feasible. And the draft retreats from Ms Takaichi’s earlier questioning of the non-nuclear principles, settling instead on “further ensuring the credibility of extended deterrence centred on US nuclear deterrence.” Whatever space the prime minister’s remarks had opened toward nuclear latency, the party’s formal doctrinal process has closed it. Even as China applied pressure, Japan deepened several alliances. Toshimitsu Motegi, the foreign minister, attended the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) foreign ministers’ meeting in New Delhi and rejected suggestions the group had been sidelined by the American-Chinese summit, naming critical minerals cooperation as the top item. The sixth summit in under a year between Ms Takaichi and Lee Jae-myung, South Korea’s president — held in Mr Lee’s hometown of Andong with near-state-visit ceremony — produced a new energy supply chain pact setting up a system to share crude oil and petroleum products under the Power Asia framework. Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the Philippine president, arrived for a four-day state visit, received Japan’s highest imperial decoration, and agreed to upgrade their relationship to a comprehensive strategic partnership; maritime security was central, with China’s behaviour the clear backdrop. Three parties in the Diet — the LDP, the Japan Innovation Party (Nippon Ishin no Kai), and the Democratic Party for the People — also formally endorsed an emergency constitutional clause permitting term extensions for lawmakers during crises, moving constitutional revision out of committee and into public debate. The economic picture is more unsettled than last week’s data suggested. Japan’s April core inflation fell to a four-year low, driven by the government’s own fuel and education subsidies, complicating the Bank of Japan’s (BOJ) case for a June rate hike. Kazuo Ueda, the BOJ governor, met Ms Takaichi for the first time since February; Mr Ueda left without consent for a June hike, and the prime minister told him to conduct “appropriate policy mindful of government steps to cushion living costs.” Markets still price the probability of a June hike at roughly 80%, but analysts now see gaining her informal approval as the main obstacle — a political consent problem, not an inflation data problem. Crude oil imports fell 64% year on year in April — the steepest drop since 1980 — as the Hormuz closure cut Middle East supply, yet a trade surplus of ¥301.9 billion emerged where a deficit had been forecast. Ms Takaichi responded by directing Satsuki Katayama, the finance minister, to compile a ¥3 trillion supplementary budget, limited to fuel subsidy reserves and summer utility costs rather than the broader stimulus the opposition sought; she cited rising bond yields as the argument against wider deficit spending. At home, 347 of the LDP’s 417 lawmakers — 83% — attended the inaugural meeting of the National Power Research Group, including rivals who had run against Ms Takaichi and Fumio Kishida, a former prime minister. The breadth of attendance simultaneously confirms the prime minister’s strength and limits the group’s utility: a club that nearly everyone joins cannot function as a factional pressure machine. The identifiable hard-opposition core — Shigeru Ishiba, Taro Kono, and a lawmaker who compared the group to the wartime Imperial Rule Assistance Association — is small and now conspicuously isolated. Ms Takaichi separately denied for the third time in Diet questioning that she or her team had commissioned defamatory videos against LDP rivals during the party leadership race; the allegation remains live but undocumented.
Quad foreign ministers convene in New Delhi on May 26; Japan's Motegi reaffirms grouping's relevance
May 20–24, 2026
LDP formally approves AI-blockchain financial infrastructure roadmap with yen stablecoins and tokenized deposits
May 19–23, 2026
Takaichi announces investment quota for 17 growth sectors including AI and semiconductors
May 23, 2026
Japan passes joint child custody reform ending 80-year sole-custody system
May 23, 2026

South Korea flag South Korea

A government-mediated deal on May 21 averted the Samsung chip workers’ strike, which had threatened to wipe 30-100 trillion won from the economy, and sent Samsung shares 8.5% higher to a record high. The deal gave semiconductor workers a bonus worth 10.5% of the division’s operating profit — mostly in stock, conditional on profit milestones — with terms more favourable to management than the rival SK Hynix settlement. A worker earning 80 million won annually stands to receive roughly 626 million won, compared with SK Hynix’s 700 million won-plus packages paid in cash. Lee Jae-myung, the president, rebuked the union at cabinet for demanding pre-tax profit sharing, signalling the government would invoke emergency arbitration if needed. Union members are voting on ratification through May 27. The settlement removes the biggest immediate risk to Korea’s AI chip output — but not all of it: foundry and packaging workers, resentful that memory-division colleagues got the bulk of the payout, have begun work slowdowns that analysts say could affect high-bandwidth memory delivery schedules. The broader market picture is less settled than Samsung’s surge suggests. Foreign investors sold $13.2 billion of Korean equities last week — the largest outflow in the exchange’s history and the second-largest in emerging Asia outside China — forcing the exchange to halt programme trading after Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) 200 futures fell 5%. Korean retail investors absorbed the selling, buying $14.1 billion in the same period. Citi called the market “much more overbought than in the U.S.” and cut half its Korea position; Goldman Sachs held its ground, maintaining a KOSPI target of 7,000 and calling Korea its “highest-conviction view in Asia.” The won fell to 1,517 per dollar on May 22, its lowest in 50 days, before the finance ministry and the Bank of Korea issued a joint verbal warning against “excessive” moves. Rather than hiking — the prior expectation — the Bank is now expected to hold at 2.5% for an eighth straight meeting under Shin Hyun-song, the incoming governor, while using published rate projections to signal one or two hikes within six months. Producer prices hit a 27-year high owing to Middle East oil costs; Seoul apartment prices are rising at their fastest weekly pace since January. Even as the economic picture stabilised, Mr Lee made the week’s most unexpected diplomatic move. At a May 20 cabinet meeting, he called Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, a “war criminal” under an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant, and directed his national security director to assess whether Seoul was obliged to arrest him should he visit Korea. The trigger was Israel’s detention of Korean nationals aboard a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in international waters, which Mr Lee called “kidnapping” and “way out of line.” The detained nationals were released the following day. Korea ratified the court’s Rome Statute in 2002 and carries genuine legal obligations under it. Whether this was a principled stand or a calculation nine days before elections — or both — the public record now exists: if Mr Netanyahu transits Seoul, the government will face a clear choice between ICC obligations and its alliances. The Netanyahu episode came in a week when Korea was otherwise deepening its regional ties. At his hometown of Andong, Mr Lee hosted Sanae Takaichi, the Japanese prime minister, for their sixth summit. The meeting produced the most concrete Korea-Japan energy security results yet under this administration: agreed frameworks for expanding liquefied natural gas and crude oil stockpiling, petroleum product swap arrangements designed to address their shared vulnerability to any disruption along the Hormuz and Malacca routes, and an upgrade of vice-ministerial security talks that Mr Lee described as “meaningful progress.” Both leaders said separately that Washington’s focus on the Middle East could reduce its Indo-Pacific presence — a rare admission that the relationship is partly insurance against American pullback. That same week, Koo Yun-cheol, the deputy prime minister, announced $6 billion in emergency funding — $3 billion each from the Korea Export-Import Bank and Korea Trade Insurance Corporation — for Middle Eastern partner economies squeezed by the Iran war. At home, the election environment tightened faster than polling had suggested. The Daegu mayoral race, once a 7-point Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) lead in late April, is now within 1 percentage point: Kim Boo-kyum of the DPK at 40%, People Power Party (PPP) challenger Choo Kyung-ho at 39%, according to a Korea Broadcasting System/Korea Research survey of 800 respondents. Park Geun-hye, the former president impeached and convicted on corruption charges in 2017, appeared at a Chilseong Market rally for Mr Choo — her first campaign activity since her fall from office — drawing hundreds of supporters, some chanting her name. The PPP is deploying her as a consolidation figure in its historic heartland; how much pull she commands outside Daegu is less clear. In the Busan North by-election, Han Dong-hoon, a former PPP leader running as an independent, leads at 34.6% against the DPK’s candidate at 32.9% and the PPP’s own candidate at 20.5% — a three-way race that could hand either major party an unexpected result. Mr Lee’s approval holds at 64-66%, but the ruling party’s June 3 election preference has fallen three consecutive weeks, from 58% in late April to 52% now. A marketing controversy became a political fight. Starbucks Korea ran a tumbler promotion on May 18 — the anniversary of the 1980 Gwangju Uprising — under the name “Tank Day,” with imagery critics read as invoking the military suppression of the event. Mr Lee condemned it on X and called for “moral, administrative, legal and political responsibility.” Jeong Yong-jin, Shinsegae’s chairman, issued a public apology; Starbucks Korea’s head was fired; government ministries and the civil service union called boycotts. Jang Dong-hyeok, the PPP chairman, accused Mr Lee of “collective bullying” and “another form of violence,” framing the government’s response as state overreach that turns a consumer issue into ideological warfare. The Gwangju uprising is the DPK’s founding narrative — rallying around its defence fires the progressive base. The PPP’s counter-framing may do the same for conservatives in exactly the races that are now competitive. On the security side, Hanwha Aerospace unveiled the KAAV-II prototype — a next-generation amphibious assault vehicle with water speed above 20km/h against the legacy model’s 13.2km/h, a 40mm autocannon capable of 85-degree elevation for anti-drone engagement, and an initial production timeline of 2029 against approved funding of roughly $1.78 billion. The Defence Ministry’s first unification white paper under Mr Lee formalised the “peaceful coexistence” doctrine: three explicit principles — respect the North Korean regime, rule out absorption unification, cease hostile acts — with sharply reduced references to both unification and North Korean human rights compared with previous editions. The monitoring group 38 North reads North Korea’s concurrent constitutional revision differently: Pyongyang is preparing for hostile two-state coexistence, not the peaceful kind, with new constitutional provisions for the defence industry and Kim Jong Un convening a military-wide commanders’ meeting to reinforce front-line units along the southern border. Seoul is offering accommodation; Pyongyang is not interested in the same arrangement.
Samsung averts 18-day strike with profit-sharing deal, but bonus inequality triggers internal fractures
May 18–24, 2026
Bank of Korea expected to hold at 2.5% with hawkish signal as won weakness and inflation pressures mount
May 19–24, 2026
Lee meets ILO chief to discuss AI-era labor policy, outlines government framework for positive AI transition
May 22, 2026
Other

Australia flag Australia

Anthony Albanese appeared to well up defending his budget at the Victorian Labor conference this week — an unusual sight for a prime minister with 94 seats — while new polling projected a One Nation surge that could reduce his government to minority. The reforms are broader than the government’s housing-affordability case suggested. Three measures form the package: a reduction in the capital gains tax (CGT) discount, new limits on negative gearing, and a 30% minimum tax on discretionary trusts. Taken together, this is the most comprehensive structural tax reform in decades — one that touches investment across asset classes and challenges the concentration of wealth that has channelled CGT benefits disproportionately to the wealthiest 10%. That ambition is precisely why the backlash has been so fierce. Business groups, start-ups, and a coalition of 40 under-40 millennial entrepreneurs united against the CGT changes. An AI meme campaign depicted Mr Albanese as a “47% silent partner.” Chris Minns, the New South Wales premier, has become a persistent critic from within Labor — a Labor-on-Labor dynamic the government did not need. Internal MPs told the Guardian that the government “doesn’t necessarily have a clear strategy on complicated issues.” Mr Albanese told the Victorian conference: investors bid up property “in the comfort that that will be an increase in their tax deduction, that all of you and every Australian taxpayer is their partner.” He received a standing ovation. He also appeared to well up. Last week’s finding — Labor’s primary vote at 29% — was troubling but containable. A new poll in the Australian Financial Review, confirmed by 9News, projected a One Nation surge large enough to reduce Labor to a minority government at the next election. That is a different category of threat. A minority government would lose the political capital that has underwritten three years of ambitious work — the AUKUS security pact (Australia, Britain and the United States), the Pacific security architecture, the budget reform itself. The government plans to push the full package — CGT, negative gearing, trusts — through before the July winter break, leaving less time for parliamentary scrutiny. In the Senate, it needs the Greens. The Greens say support is likely but conditional: they want the grandfathering exemption removed — the provision protecting existing property investors from the new restrictions. Granting that demand would make the negative gearing reform far more comprehensive than announced; refusing it risks a Senate standoff. The accelerated timeline looks less like confidence than an attempt to limit the time the Greens have to harden their conditions. Angus Taylor, the opposition leader, is managing problems of his own. Andrew McLachlan, a Liberal senator, broke publicly with Mr Taylor’s proposal to strip welfare access from non-citizen permanent residents. Jacinta Price, a shadow minister, denied agreeing to a remark about migrants from India, China and Africa — a situation Mr Taylor contained by accepting her explanation, but not elegantly. He also backed gas extraction at an Adelaide energy conference, at odds with the South Australian Liberal Party. The Coalition’s internal fractures continue to show. Richard Marles, the defence minister, travelled to Dili for the 24th anniversary of Timor-Leste’s restoration of independence, meeting José Ramos-Horta, the president, and Xanana Gusmão, the prime minister. The visit confirmed progress on the New Partnership for a New Era (Parseria Foun ba Era Foun) bilateral framework, agreed in January, and opened discussions on integrating Timor-Leste into the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defence Ministers’ Plus process following its accession to the bloc in 2025. The Darwin-Dili corridor — 720 kilometres — is Australia’s closest security link in the region. In Exercise Balikatan — the largest in the exercise’s history — the Australian Defence Force (ADF) posted two firsts: HMAS Toowoomba became the first Royal Australian Navy major fleet unit to participate, and Combat Team Jackal became the first Australia-New Zealand combined call sign to operate in combat team configuration, embedded alongside US High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) units in coastal defence live-fire. The exercise concluded on 8 May; formal confirmation came this week. All Army mortar platoons completed danger-close live-fire recertification separately — a readiness measure following the previous week’s suspension of ADF parachuting after a training accident.
Labor's 2026 budget tax reforms trigger political firestorm over CGT, negative gearing and trusts
May 17–25, 2026
Taylor's budget reply pivots Coalition hard on immigration welfare cuts and migration cap tied to housing
May 18–25, 2026

Indonesia flag Indonesia

Indonesia’s rupiah hit a record low of Rp17,745 this week. The government’s three-part response — a surprise rate hike, new capital controls, and a plan to channel the country’s top commodity exports through a new state entity — deepened investor alarm rather than easing it. Bank Indonesia raised its benchmark rate 50 basis points to 5.25%, the first hike in two years and double what analysts had expected, citing rupiah pressure and Middle East volatility. The currency settled near Rp17,600 after the decision — still a record — and showed no sign of sustained recovery. Foreign reserves have fallen $10 billion since last April; the first-quarter current account deficit reached 1.09% of GDP; Fitch and Moody’s have both put the credit rating on negative outlook. SEB concluded the rupiah faces further weakness. The Finance Ministry is buying up to $113 million in government bonds daily to keep yields from rising further. The bigger structural move was the commodity export centralisation. At a parliamentary plenary, Prabowo Subianto announced that PT Danantara Sumberdaya Indonesia (DSI) — a new entity under the oversight of Danantara, the state investment fund — will act as the routing channel for coal, palm oil, and ferronickel, Indonesia’s three largest export commodities. From June 1, exporters must hold all revenues in state-owned banks. Airlangga Hartarto, the senior economic minister, said the aim was to stabilise the rupiah; the president claimed $908 billion had been lost to under-invoicing over 34 years. Rumours of the plan had pushed Jakarta’s stock exchange down 3.5% on Tuesday; the exchange fell a further 0.82% on Wednesday after the formal announcement. Analysts at Macquarie Capital, S&P Global Energy, and Credit Agricole reached the same conclusion: policy uncertainty had deepened, not diminished. Bank Indonesia also capped dollar purchases at $25,000 per transaction. Combined with the export revenue retention requirement and the new commodity intermediary, the package moves Indonesia toward managed-capital-account territory. Foreign portfolio investors are likely to read the dollar cap as a precursor to broader controls — a parallel that Malaysia’s 1998 experience does nothing to ease. The choice of Luke Thomas Mahony, an Australian, to lead the new entity was unexpected. For a government that campaigns on resource nationalism and frames commodity extraction in terms of colonial grievance, appointing a foreign national to run the entity that will control those very exports requires explanation. The most plausible reading is that an Australian — not Chinese, not American — gives the entity a claim to global-market neutrality that a domestic political appointee could not provide, and gives the administration diplomatic cover if the new structure disrupts existing trade relationships. Rosan Roeslani, Danantara’s chief executive, confirmed the appointment. Whether Mr Mahony’s authority proves real or symbolic is unclear. The economic crisis has also accelerated the centralisation of fiscal power in the presidency. Mr Prabowo delivered the 2027 macroeconomic framework and fiscal outline to parliament himself — a 95-minute address traditionally performed by the finance minister. The 2027 deficit target of 1.8–2.4% of GDP was the headline, but the manner of delivery was the signal. The new entity’s creation followed the same pattern: announced at a parliamentary address rather than through a Ministry of Trade regulatory process. Danantara’s mandate has grown from managing state-owned enterprise assets to overseeing the routing and pricing of Indonesia’s top three export commodity flows, with no new oversight mechanism in place and no update on the outstanding audit of Danantara’s 2025 accounts. The broader political coalition is holding — and positioning for 2029. Golkar’s deputy chairman confirmed the party will consider formally backing a Prabowo-Gibran second term, adding that support would follow if the government succeeds. Bara JP went further, with its chairman saying the endorsement followed a direct instruction from Joko Widodo, the former president, at the party’s plenary. The Jokowi-Prabowo alignment is not passive; it is actively maintained. That Golkar’s Idrus Marham moved quickly this week to dismiss the 1998 parallel — asserting Indonesia is building a Pancasila economy, not sliding toward crisis — suggests party leaders are co-ordinating their response on the economy. Mr Prabowo also used his parliamentary appearance to praise the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), the sole opposition bloc, calling its decision to stay out of the coalition a “sacrifice” serving democracy’s checks and balances and saying sharp PDI-P criticism sometimes keeps him awake at night but “may have some truth in it.” Puan Maharani, the PDI-P deputy speaker, confirmed the party’s criticism is “constructive.” The gesture costs the president nothing — the coalition holds 81% of parliament — but offers external audiences a signal of democratic normalcy during an acute economic crisis. It is image management, not concession. Gibran Rakabuming Raka, the vice president, was in Nusa Tenggara Timur, where he made an unscheduled stop in Amfoang at students’ urging, inspected two broken bridges isolating several sub-districts, apologised to residents, and promoted seaweed farming under Prabowo’s food sovereignty programme. He declared “no more Java-centric development, but Indonesia-centric.” The outer-island circuit — attentive, responsive, stamped with the food sovereignty programme — drew coverage from 25 domestic outlets. The political elite is already positioning for 2029 even as the rupiah sets records.
Prabowo announces centralized commodity export control through new state entity, markets spooked
May 20–25, 2026
Rupiah hits record lows as Bank Indonesia delivers surprise 50bp rate hike and tightens dollar controls
May 18–25, 2026
Vice President Gibran conducts extensive working visit to NTT, highlighting infrastructure gaps and food sovereignty projects
May 21–24, 2026
PDI-P consolidates for 2029 elections through nationwide branch assemblies (Musancab)
May 22–25, 2026